The National Scene - Written by Beasley Allen on Monday, July 10, 2006 8:12 - 0 Comments
Some Say ExxonMobil Could Be Labeled A Corporate Villain
If you had to pick one company in America as the ultimate corporate villain on issues that affect ordinary citizens, some say you might be hard-pressed to find a better candidate than ExxonMobil. At a time when most folks are mad as hornets over soaring gasoline prices, ExxonMobil is making money hand over fist and is doing so at an increasing rate. In fact, this giant corporation is actually making more money than any other oil company in the world. As a result, they are doing quite well financially at a time when ordinary folks are really suffering from a fiscal or economic perspective. While the top officers and some of the ExxonMobil stockholders have to be very happy over the current state of affairs, just about everyone else these days is mighty upset with this powerful company. Not all of the shareholders are pleased, however, because of other factors, which will be discussed below.
There are a number of reasons for folks to be unhappy with the giant oil company – the first obviously being the outrageous cost of gasoline, as well as being the pay packages and perks for top company officials, the utter disregard the company has for the court system, and the company’s position on global warming. In fact, environmentalists have a legitimate right to be upset with ExxonMobil for a variety of reasons:
• the company’s willingness to spend millions of dollars to refute the significance or even the existence of global warming, and the role of energy companies in exacerbating it;
• its extraordinary lobbying to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil and gas exploration; and
• its continuing refusal to make good on its full compensation payments to the victims of the 1988 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska.
Watchdogs of good corporate governance have been raising eyebrows for years at the compensation collected by ExxonMobil’s top officers. Lee Raymond, its recently retired CEO, has been a particular object of public scrutiny for some time. Last November, Raymond testified before Congress that America’s soaring gasoline prices were caused by “global supply and demand” and promised that ExxonMobil was itself feeling the pain being felt by consumers. You may remember when Raymond said during the hearing: “We’re all in this together.” That’s what he told members of Congress and at the time most of us assumed he was referring to U.S. citizens and not just to their political friends. It should be noted that the statement was made before it became known that ExxonMobil had made a record-breaking $36 billion in profits in 2005, a 40 per cent increase over the previous year.
ExxonMobil has repeatedly shown that it is very much on the wrong side of environmental issues. Eric Goldstein, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council, a leading environmental lobbying group, made this observation:
ExxonMobil has gone out of its way time and again to distinguish itself from its competitors as the most anti-environmental oil company.
I understand that ExxonMobil has financed about 40 organizations dedicated to derailing the efforts to slow down global warming, starting in the late 1980s. Mr. Raymond himself has twice served as chairman of the climate change-denying group, Global Climate Coalition. Even the federal government – in spite of the fact that the Bush Administration has denied that global warming is even a serious problem – has found evidence that ExxonMobil has contributed directly to the increased cost of energy. Interestingly, the Government Accountability Office recently found that Exxon’s 1999 merger with Mobil alone added four to five cents to the price of a gallon of gasoline.
One way to figure out how good or bad the folks are who run a large corporation is to simply to look and see how they treat their own employees. ExxonMobil is now under attack by lawmakers and shareholders as a result of the company’s failure to cover a $3.9 billion shortfall in its pension fund. When companies like this are providing their CEO’s with tremendous benefits and all sorts of perks, it is tragic that they would refuse to fund pension plans properly for their own employees. Having been on the opposite side of the table with this giant oil company in a few lawsuits, I am not at all surprised. Incidentally, they currently owe the State of Alabama about $4 billion in as clear a case of corporate fraud as you will ever see and the company still refuses to pay!
- West Virginia Court Upholds Punitive Damages Award Against DuPont
- An Update On The U-Haul Litigation
- Unconscionable Mandatory Arbitration Clauses Challenged
- Plant That Made Tylenol And Other Pediatric Medicine Lacked Quality Control
- Utah Sues Drug Makers For Off-Label Marketing
- Drug Maker Fails To Cooperate
- Predatory-Lending Lawsuits Are Still On The Rise
- Wal-Mart To Limit Toxic Cadmium In Products For Children
- Bible verses for the month
- Parting Words
- Bankruptcies by General Motors & Chrysler
- The crisis in the Gulf makes clear the importance of our Judicial System
- Others share the blame with BP
- Closing Observations
- Bible verses for the month
- First female lawyer to head the Alabama State Bar
- Tom Methvin ends his term as State Bar President
- Gibson Vance assumes the role as President of AAJ
- Laurie Little
- Maureen Manno
- Ms. Bissett,
Below is the contact info for the Spelter class claims administr...
- thank you for any information that you can email me at lucklylady5654@yahoo.com...
- i did live in hughes wv. and included in the spelter lawsuit. i would like to kn...
- Wells Fargo approved my loan modifaction loan for 18 months. Not any of the fun...
- i'm so blessed cause God is a live in my life i've already exprience him.
He k...
- Thnx for the different message because this means a lot in my life. Since i've s...
- I would like to join in on the case and I also have another one. I was a store...
- I am interested in your Bible verses. Making a recent study of Martin Luther has...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Legal Strategies
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Oil Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Tractor Trailer Accident
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Alabama Injury Lawyer
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Denied Disability
- Lantus Attorney
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Chantix Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Heparin Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Reglan Lawyer
- Gardasil
- Yaz Side Effects
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Trasylol Recall
- Antibiotics
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
Personal Injury, Recent Settlements - Jul 19, 2010 14:03 - 0 Comments
Wrongful Death Settlement In Civil Damages Act
More In Recent Settlements
- Heavy Truck Case Is Settled
- Settlement of an industrial machinery accident
- Three Explorer Rollover Settlements
- Jury awards $2.75 million in Explorer Rollover case
- Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
Product Liability - Jul 31, 2010 15:21 - 0 Comments
Reclining Seats Are A Hidden Danger
More In Product Liability
- Cooper Tire Involved In Tragic Highway Crash
- More On The Dangers Of 15-Passenger Vans
- The Overlooked Problem Of Clothing-Related Burn Injuries And Deaths
- A Look At What The Carmakers Have Known
- Jury Returns Verdict In Yamaha Case
Recalls Update - Aug 19, 2010 12:24 - 0 Comments
Prescription Cat Food Recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Roman and Roller Shades by Smith + Noble Recalled
- Perdue Farms recalls chicken nuggets
- Bagged baby spinach salads recalled
- Jewelry from popular tween stores recalled over cadmium
- Wire Feed Welders recalled by Star Asia USA due to burn hazard
Leave a Reply