The National Scene - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, April 7, 2006 10:12 - 0 Comments
Oil Giants Failed To Pay Fees Due To Federal Government
Normally oil companies have to pay the standard royalty of 12% on oil or gas produced on lands owned by the federal government. Under the government’s royalty relief program, companies that drill in deep waters off the Gulf of Mexico don’t have to pay the royalty on the large quantities of the oil or gas they produce. But federal regulations also call for that special incentive to be suspended if market prices rise above certain threshold levels. Market prices for both oil and natural gas have been higher than those levels since the end of 2002. This means the 12% royalty should have been paid by all the companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico.
More than three dozen energy companies fell nearly $500 million behind last year on royalty payments they owed to the federal government for oil and gas extracted from public territory. This is according to Interior Department documents that were released in February. While most of that money was later paid after the government demanded payment, almost $60 million remains in dispute. The companies, which included major producers like Chevron, Shell, and ConocoPhillips, had claimed lucrative government incentives for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico even though the incentives were not supposed to be available if market prices climbed above certain “threshold prices.”
The Interior Department sent a report to lawmakers looking into the energy royalty program that revealed that the companies had failed to make the royalty payments. Forty-one companies were identified that incorrectly claimed about $493 million in “royalty relief” during 2004, when prices for both oil and gas climbed to record highs. The Interior Department said that 38 of the 41 companies paid $435 million in back royalties after it sent out warning letters in December. This was money that should have been paid shortly after the end of 2004. Three companies – Kerr-McGee, Forest Oil, and AGIP – continue to say they don’t plan to pay $58 million in additional payments.
Royalty payments for oil and gas extracted from federal territory have drawn increased attention from Congress since The New York Times reported in January that royalty payments had not climbed in line with the huge increase in market prices. Last year, the government received about $5.15 billion in royalties on natural gas and about $3.5 billion in royalties on oil. While royalties have climbed sharply since 2003, they are still barely even with amounts collected in 2001, at a time when market prices were much lower. One apparent reason for the shortfall is that the government has had trouble auditing the flow of money.
The companies receiving the letters demanding payment included many of the biggest producers in the Gulf of Mexico: Anadarko, Amerada Hess, British Petroleum, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Kerr-McGee, Shell, and more than two dozen others. But several major producers, like Exxon Mobil, were not on the list. Exxon officials told the Times that their company stopped claiming royalty relief long ago, because market prices had exceeded the price thresholds.
Source: The New York Times
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Employee Rights
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fleet Attorney
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Reglan Lawyer
- Pain Pumps
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Vytorin Cancer
- Heparin Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Chantix Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Trasylol Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply