Enviromental Concerns - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, March 9, 2006 11:26 - 0 Comments
DuPont Agrees To Phase Out PFOA
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has requested that eight chemical makers voluntarily stop the use of a chemical used in the production of Teflon and other non-stick products. DuPont Company says that it will comply with that request. The EPA has asked the companies to gradually reduce the use of perflourooctanoic acid (PFOA), which is used to manufacturer several products including non-stick cookware, waterproofing products, and some fast food containers. Studies have linked PFOA to cancer in animals. As expected, DuPont maintains that its cookware and other consumer products made using PFOA are safe for consumers. But, an EPA advisory group now says that most of its members agree that the main chemical under review – PFOA – is a likely cancer causing agent. Further study was recommended by the committee.
DuPont is the only U.S. producer of PFOA. China is also a major producer of the substance. The other seven companies buy the substance from DuPont and a couple of non-U.S. chemical companies. By focusing on these eight companies, the EPA would eliminate more that three-quarters of the use of PFOA globally. That would leave China as the largest remaining producer of PFOA. The EPA has asked the eight companies to reduce their use of PFOA by 95% in 2010 and to eliminate it by 2015. I am not sure exactly what the EPA will do now that the advisory group has issued its report. The other companies include 3M/Dyneon Company, Paris-based Arkema Inc., Japan’s AGC Chemicals/Asahi Glass, Switzerland’s Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding, Inc., Switzerland-based Clariant Corp., Japan’s Daikin Industries Ltd., and Italy’s Solvay Solexic.
You will recall that recently the EPA imposed a $10.25 million fine on DuPont, the largest civil penalty in EPA’s history. This was part of a settlement of charges that the company hid information on PFOA. DuPont’s most serious violation appeared to be that it failed to report that it knew in 1991 that a mother had transferred PFOA residues in her body to her fetus during her pregnancy. As a part of the settlement, DuPont announced it would reduce its emissions of the substance by 98%, and it said recently that it has already reached the 94% mark. DuPont still faces legal issues surrounding PFOA. A U.S. federal grand jury has subpoenaed documents from the company regarding the substance.
A group of scientific advisers to the EPA voted unanimously last month to approve a recommendation that PFOA should be considered a likely human carcinogen. The approval of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board is conditioned on minor clarifications being made to a draft report, but no major changes will be made to the panel’s findings. The revisions called for by the board include clarifying the scope of dissent among members of the advisory board panel that reviewed the EPA’s draft risk assessment of the chemical. Board members also agreed the report should clarify that the panel’s findings shouldn’t be considered the last word on the chemical, but should be updated as additional data become available.
Source: Wall Street Journal and Associated Press
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Reglan Lawyer
- Vytorin Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Trasylol Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Heparin Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Fleet Attorney
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Pain Pumps
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply